UX AGENT

Live public health redesign Product design · Design engineering

I redesigned and built Know the Dangers.Finding help came first.

People came to Know the Dangers for answers, naloxone, or help. The campaign’s growing content made those paths hard to find. I redesigned the navigation, content, and mobile experience, then built the WordPress front end around what visitors needed to do next.

My role in the redesign. Research through launch.
What I did

I spoke with campaign staff and people with lived experience, then reviewed analytics, heatmaps, and content. I mapped visitor paths, created wireframes, wrote the pages, designed the interface, and built the responsive WordPress front end in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. I also handled accessibility, SEO, tracking, launch support, and post-launch review.

StatewideOne clear public health resource
83.8%Visitors on mobile
End to endResearch through the live build
Risk → answers → action Know the Dangers
Know the Dangers public health website redesign showing opioid education and help resources
Visitor questionWhat do I need to know or do right now?
Next stepUnderstand the risk, find naloxone, or get help

01 People

The campaign had grown. Help was hard to find.

Know the Dangers began with synthetic-drug education. As opioid facts, warnings, stories, and resources grew, the site’s structure no longer made the next step clear.

Someone worried about immediate danger needed a different starting point from a family member, a person seeking treatment, or an educator. I redesigned the navigation and pages around those different needs.

I owned the website redesign and responsive WordPress build. Conversations with campaign staff and people with lived experience, alongside analytics and heatmaps, shaped what I changed. I carried those decisions from wireframes and writing through the live pages and post-launch review.

The question behind the redesign

Can someone under pressure find the right action before reading the whole page?

Research

I compared what people needed with what the site put first.

Conversations gave me the priorities. Analytics, heatmaps, and the content review showed how the site presented them. I used both to decide what needed to move forward.

Analytics and traffic paths

I followed entry pages, traffic sources, and device use, then reviewed the routes to help, naloxone, treatment, resources, and recovery content.

Heatmaps and scroll behavior

I checked clicks and scroll depth to see which choices drew attention and which resources sat further down the page.

Stakeholder conversations

Campaign stakeholders helped define public-health goals, accurate language, priority resources, and audience needs.

Content and SEO audit

I identified outdated priorities, repeated ideas, buried resources, unclear labels, and weak search entry points.

People

People arrived with different questions and urgency.

I used these audience needs to shape the starting choices. Someone looking for facts should not have to follow the same route as someone looking for help.

Someone worried about immediate danger

May be scared, moving fast, and unsure whether what they are seeing is an overdose.

Needs to know: Is this an emergency, and what do I do now?

A family member or friend

Needs clear guidance, signs to watch for, naloxone access, and support without judgment or jargon.

Needs to know: How can I help without making this worse?

Someone seeking treatment or recovery

May need reassurance, a clear route to care, recovery stories, and a first step that feels possible.

Needs to know: Where can I start, and will someone meet me there?

A community educator or partner

Needs trustworthy facts, useful materials, and a simple way to point other people toward help.

Needs to know: What can I trust, use, and share?

Who I spoke with

I listened before I moved help forward.

I spoke with campaign staff and people who were using drugs. Those conversations made a priority clear: people needed a quick route to resources and naloxone.

  • Campaign staff

    The team behind the resource

    The team helped define the information, language, and priority resources the website needed to support.

  • People with lived experience

    People who were using drugs

    People described what they needed to reach quickly. I used those conversations to prioritize resources and naloxone in the first choices on the site.

I connected what I heard

Help had to stay within reach.

I brought those needs together with the analytics, heatmaps, and content review. I made the naloxone action prominent and kept it visible as people scrolled, with direct routes to resources alongside it.

  • Visible naloxone action
  • Direct resource paths
  • Clear first choices
  • Mobile reading order

Retrospective summary, not verbatim interview notes.

02 Design

I put urgent help before the campaign message.

I separated the route to urgent help from the routes to learning and support. That let the site serve different needs without asking everyone to work through the campaign introduction. The navigation and mobile reading order followed those choices.

01

Is someone in immediate danger?

Emergency instructions before campaign messaging.

02

What am I trying to understand?

Direct paths to facts, warning signs, fentanyl, overdose, and changing risks.

03

Do I need naloxone?

What naloxone is, how it works, and where to find it.

04

Where can I find support?

Treatment, recovery, local resources, and help for someone else.

05

What can I share?

Facts, stories, videos, and community resources.

Representative reconstruction

I put the first choices into wireframes.

I laid out urgent guidance, help and learning paths, audience choices, and supporting content before refining the visual design. This is a representative reconstruction of that planning logic, not an original working file.

The opening offered a place to begin. Supporting content explained the options further down the page.

See the design rules

I carried the same priorities into each page.

The page order guided the interface details: labels, typography, cards, buttons, and where important actions returned.

Lead with the immediate action

Emergency guidance, naloxone, and help came before campaign introductions.

Use plain language to route people

Familiar labels established the path. Clinical detail stayed available further in.

Design for the phone first

With 83.8% of visitors on mobile, I designed reading order, controls, forms, maps, and actions for phones first.

Create repetition without clutter

Important actions returned where the surrounding information gave people a reason to use them.

Before the redesign

Campaign content competed with help.

  • The original focus lagged behind the changing opioid crisis.
  • Dense tiles had no clear reading order.
  • Help, facts, naloxone, stories, and treatment were hard to locate.
  • Long pages became harder to use on phones.
  • Actions competed with the information.
Redesign direction

I gave help a recognizable starting point.

  • Emergency guidance and help stayed visible.
  • Navigation followed visitor tasks.
  • Audience paths helped people recognize their route.
  • Mobile content supported scanning and touch.
  • Actions appeared beside the information that explained them.

The new page order brought help forward.

The campaign stayed recognizable. I changed the navigation, layouts, and content order so help and audience choices came first, with education and supporting detail below.

Previous site Previous Know the Dangers website with dense campaign sections and multiple competing content tilesEnlarge image
Redesigned site Redesigned Know the Dangers website with clearer opioid information, audience pathways, resources, and naloxone actionsEnlarge image

The screenshots show how I changed both the visual hierarchy and the routes through the content.

Site structure Urgent actions Mobile-first order UX writing

Mobile path

83.8% of visitors used phones. I designed for them first.

I simplified the header, shortened the openings, and gave controls more room to tap. Urgent routes stayed near the top. Further down, I placed actions beside the information that explained them.

  • Readable emergency guidance
  • Navigation focused on useful paths
  • Content ordered for scanning and touch
  • Phone-friendly resource cards and forms
  • Shorter headings and opening copy
Know the Dangers mobile mockup showing the Find Naloxone action and location finder on two phone screens Enlarge image

03 Build

I built the site, including the finder and forms.

I wrote the HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and built reusable WordPress components for the pages, finder, resources, and forms. I carried the reading order and urgent actions into the responsive build, with accessibility, SEO, tracking, and release checks included.

The site had to stay usable as the content grew.

I built shared page and content components so editors could update resources and campaign material without rebuilding layouts or losing the reading order.

HTML + CSS

I built the reading order into the pages.

I built the HTML and responsive CSS around task-based navigation, clear headings, and direct paths to facts, naloxone, treatment, and resources.

Urgent guidance stayed visible on smaller screens.

I built the persistent emergency layer and shared page layouts so urgent actions stayed visible without overwhelming the content. CSS controlled type, spacing, cards, and smaller-screen order.

WordPress

Shared components carried the campaign.

I built WordPress components for audience cards, warnings, resources, stories, lessons, videos, and actions. Shared layout rules kept new content inside the design.

Editors could update content without rebuilding.

I set up the pages so editors could update information while preserving spacing, hierarchy, accessibility, and mobile behavior.

JavaScript + QA

I checked what happened after a tap or click.

I implemented JavaScript components and checked navigation, forms, maps, and actions in the browser. Keyboard support, tap behavior, and responsive states stayed part of the review.

The review continued beyond the layout.

I checked headings, contrast, alt text, metadata, crawlable content, mobile performance, tracking, and heatmaps before and after launch.

See the research-to-launch process
01

Read the behavior

I reviewed traffic, heatmaps, device use, and stakeholder input to identify buried actions.

02

Reframe the content

I grouped content around urgent questions, risks, naloxone, treatment, recovery, stories, audiences, and resources.

03

Wireframe the first moves

I created wireframes for the emergency layer, message, help paths, audience choices, and repeated actions.

04

Design a usable campaign system

I designed readable type, clear buttons, reusable cards, and human imagery to balance urgency with hope.

05

Build it in WordPress

I built responsive HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and WordPress components for resources, the finder, forms, and content.

06

Measure and refine

I reviewed traffic, mobile use, engagement, scroll depth, actions, forms, and search growth after launch.

Know the Dangers development screens including naloxone information, a finder map, forms, and responsive page layouts

Design into code

I checked the whole path in the browser.

I followed the routes through the working pages, finder, and forms. I checked reading order, urgent messages, tap behavior, and resource links together, so the review covered what happened between pages as well as inside them.

  • HTML, CSS, and JavaScript components in WordPress
  • Naloxone finder and resource pathways
  • Reusable campaign and education components
  • UX writing and content restructuring
  • SEO, accessibility, performance, tracking, and QA
Enlarge image

04 Behavior

Heatmaps showed where people stopped. I moved resources earlier.

Heatmaps showed attention around emergency guidance, navigation, search, “Get Help Now,” and the first content choices. Fewer people reached the lower sections. I moved priority resources earlier and repeated actions where the content gave people a reason to use them.

Attention

Help and navigation drew attention.

Emergency guidance, search, navigation, and the help action earned attention before deeper campaign content.

Choice

People used the first content choices.

I made the early content choices part of the route through the page rather than relying on a long introduction.

Depth

Lower sections reached fewer people.

Scroll depth dropped further down the page, so I moved important resources earlier instead of depending on everyone reaching them.

Iteration

I repeated actions after useful context.

I placed important actions after the information that explained them, giving readers another route to help as they continued.

The heatmap informed the next page order.

The original heatmap and scroll-depth image show the clicks and reading depth I reviewed when refining the page.

Know the Dangers heatmap analysis showing attention around the emergency bar, navigation, help action, first-screen content, and decreasing scroll depth

This review informed changes to the first screen, resource placement, and where help actions returned.

Heatmaps Scroll depth Action placement Mobile behavior
Enlarge image
I could not depend on someone reaching the bottom of the page to find help.

I kept urgent routes near the top and placed later actions beside the information that explained them.

What I carried into later updates

Each update had to keep the route to help clear.

I used the same checks as new pages, stories, campaigns, and resources were added.

01

Protect the urgent layer

Keep emergency guidance and help visible, readable, and separate from campaign messaging.

02

Track the next action

Track routes to naloxone, treatment, forms, maps, and resources, not just page views.

03

Keep mobile content intentional

Review the order and length of every new section on a phone.

04

Use search growth as a content signal

Use growing search entry pages to identify questions that need a clearer next step.

05 Results

Views of Opioid Addiction Resources rose 240.79%.

The reported period combined the redesign, mobile improvements, SEO, content, social and cross-network campaigns. These figures describe that combined work, not the effect of one screen.

+2,681.65%

Reported user growth

Audience

The campaign and redesigned experience reached a much larger audience during the measured period.

7,621

New users

Acquisition

Social and cross-network campaigns brought thousands of new people to the public-health resource.

83.8%

Visitors on mobile

Device reality

The audience confirmed that mobile order, speed, tap behavior, and short reading windows had to lead the design.

+240.79%

Resource page views

Opioid Addiction Resources

A high-priority resource page saw a large increase in use after the redesign and campaign work.

I looked beyond traffic to the use of priority resources.

I brought priority resources forward and placed actions such as “Get Help Now” beside the information that explained them. The analytics summary reports more exploration of priority content and more activity on recovery-related forms during the combined redesign and campaign work.

EarlierHelp, naloxone, and resource choices appeared closer to the first question.
DeeperBetter content placement helped more people explore priority sections.
ClearerClear actions connected the information to a useful next step.

Performance figures come from the analytics summary supplied for this case study. They reflect the measured redesign and campaign period. They show the overall direction, not the impact of one isolated design change.

How I read the results

The results pointed to what I needed to check next.

I read the results alongside the heatmaps: who arrived, which devices they used, and whether they reached priority content. Together, they guided the next review. The figures reflect the combined work, not an isolated design test.

01

Mobile was the main experience

The device mix supported designing for phones from the start.

02

Priority resources earned more use

Resource views reflected the combined work on navigation, search, campaign traffic, and page order.

03

Reach and UX worked together

More traffic needed a clear route to help, naloxone, treatment, and resources after the click.

04

Measurement supported the next changes

Analytics and heatmaps helped the team review new content and changing needs after launch.

Clearer urgent paths

Direct routes to emergency guidance, help, naloxone, treatment, and resources.

A true mobile experience

Reading order and tap behavior built around the device most people used.

More useful reach

SEO, campaigns, content, and UX connected visitors to priority information.

A measurable foundation

Analytics, heatmaps, forms, and action tracking informed future changes.

See my full contribution

My contribution

I owned the design and front-end build.

I researched the problem, mapped the visitor journeys, wrote the content, designed the interface, and built the responsive WordPress front end. Accessibility, SEO, release checks, and post-launch review stayed part of that work.

Stakeholder conversations and requirements
UX analysis and stakeholder presentation
Analytics, traffic paths, device review, and heatmaps
Content inventory, SEO audit, and search planning
Site structure and navigation
User journeys and urgent-action flows
Wireframes, visual layouts, and interface design
Mobile-first and responsive design
UX writing and content restructuring
HTML, CSS, and JavaScript front-end development
Naloxone finder and resource experience
Reusable WordPress page and campaign components
SEO, metadata, and crawlable content structure
Accessibility, performance, responsive QA, and launch support
Post-launch analytics, heatmaps, and iteration
The work in one sentence

I rebuilt the site around what someone needed to do next.

I kept the same question in view from the first conversations to the working site: what does this person need next? I carried the answer through the content, layouts, and code, then used analytics and heatmaps to guide the next update.

Know the Dangers project image

Open original